FOWF vs IVV
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FOWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOWF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.89% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.63% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
FOWF vs IVV Performance
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FOWF returned +23.63% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, FOWF is up 16.89% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.5% for FOWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for FOWF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOWF charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOWF currently yields 0.73% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FOWF and IVV share 55 holdings out of 543 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOWF or IVV?
FOWF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FOWF or IVV?
Over the past year FOWF returned +23.63% vs +20.70% for IVV, so FOWF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOWF annualized +29.33% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FOWF or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.5% for FOWF. Worst drawdown: FOWF -12.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FOWF and IVV?
FOWF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FOWF and IVV?
FOWF and IVV share 55 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 543 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOWF or IVV?
FOWF yields 0.73% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.