FOWF vs VOO
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FOWF or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FOWF led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOWF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 98 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.92% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.54% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $14,403Best | $13,491 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 23, 2026 (1.8 years).
FOWF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
FOWF vs VOO Performance
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FOWF returned +11.54% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, FOWF is up 8.92% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FOWF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for FOWF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOWF charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOWF currently yields 0.73% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
75.1% of FOWF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.5% of VOO's money is in holdings FOWF also owns.
Most of FOWF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
53 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FOWF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 98 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 434 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FOWF (69.6% of the fund), and 8 for FOWF that do not appear in VOO (5.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FOWF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.75% | 7.55% | 6.80% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 7.11% | 0.45% | 6.66% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 7.14% | 0.18% | 6.96% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 7.12% | 0.15% | 6.97% |
| BABoeing Co | 6.91% | 0.26% | 6.65% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 7.04% | 0.11% | 6.93% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.74% | 5.36% | 4.62% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.73% | 4.13% | 3.40% |
| LDOSLeidos Holdings, Inc. | 3.88% | 0.02% | 3.86% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 3.44% | 0.08% | 3.36% |
75.1% of FOWF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOWF or VOO?
FOWF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FOWF or VOO?
Over the past year FOWF returned +11.54% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOWF annualized +22.47% vs +18.10% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FOWF or VOO?
FOWF has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FOWF -12.3% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FOWF and VOO?
FOWF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FOWF and VOO?
75.1% of FOWF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 29.5% of VOO's is in holdings FOWF also owns. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in FOWF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOWF or VOO?
FOWF yields 0.73% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FOWF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FOWF led over the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.