FOWF vs VOO
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FOWF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOWF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.76% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 94 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.59% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FOWF vs VOO Performance
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FOWF returned +24.59% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, FOWF is up 18.03% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 12.7% for FOWF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for FOWF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOWF charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOWF currently yields 0.76% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FOWF and VOO share 57 holdings out of 541 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOWF or VOO?
FOWF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FOWF or VOO?
Over the past year FOWF returned +24.59% vs +22.02% for VOO, so FOWF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOWF annualized +30.36% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FOWF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 12.7% for FOWF. Worst drawdown: FOWF -12.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FOWF and VOO?
FOWF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FOWF and VOO?
FOWF and VOO share 57 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 541 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOWF or VOO?
FOWF yields 0.76% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.