FQAL vs TYLG
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
FQAL has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. FQAL offers more diversification with 130 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FQAL | TYLG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $15M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 8.89% | |
| Holdings | 130 | 78 | |
| YTD Return | +12.56% | +21.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.37% | +35.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.54% | +23.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.62% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.1% | -24.5% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Nov 21, 2022 |
FQAL vs TYLG Performance
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year FQAL returned +19.37% while TYLG returned +35.64%. Year to date, FQAL is up 12.56% versus a gain of 21.18% for TYLG.
Over three years, FQAL compounded at +20.54% per year against +23.66% for TYLG. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.12% annualized vs +13.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.0% for FQAL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.1% for FQAL and -24.5% for TYLG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FQAL charges 0.15% per year while TYLG charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $60 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FQAL currently yields 1.15% against 8.89% for TYLG.
Holdings Overlap
FQAL and TYLG share 14 holdings out of 185 unique holdings combined, representing a 27.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FQAL or TYLG?
FQAL has an expense ratio of 0.15% while TYLG charges 0.60%. FQAL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FQAL or TYLG?
Over the past year FQAL returned +19.37% vs +35.64% for TYLG, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FQAL annualized +13.76% vs +25.12% for TYLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FQAL or TYLG?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.0% for FQAL. Worst drawdown: FQAL -34.1% vs TYLG -24.5%.
Should I hold both FQAL and TYLG?
FQAL and TYLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FQAL and TYLG?
FQAL and TYLG share 14 common holdings with a 27.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 185 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FQAL or TYLG?
FQAL yields 1.15% while TYLG yields 8.89%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.