FRGN vs SCHD
Horizon International Equity ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FRGN or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FRGN is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FRGN | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $156M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 284 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +21.72% | +25.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.89% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FRGN vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FRGN vs SCHD Performance
Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) is an ETF from Horizon Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, FRGN is up 21.72% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FRGN charges 0.75% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $6 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRGN currently yields 0.21% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 283 holdings in FRGN and 100 in SCHD, totalling 99.2% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, FRGN as of May 31, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 283 positions we hold weights for in FRGN and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 284 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 99 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FRGN (99.9% of the fund), and 12 for FRGN that do not appear in SCHD (6.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FRGN and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FRGN or SCHD?
FRGN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FRGN or SCHD?
FRGN yields 0.21% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FRGN?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FRGN is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.