FRGN vs IVV
Horizon International Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FRGN or IVV?
IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FRGN is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FRGN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $156M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 284 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +21.72%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FRGN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FRGN vs IVV Performance
Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) is an ETF from Horizon Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FRGN is up 21.72% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FRGN charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRGN currently yields 0.21% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of FRGN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings FRGN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 66 days apart, FRGN as of May 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 283 positions we hold weights for in FRGN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 284 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FRGN (99.3% of the fund), and 11 for FRGN that do not appear in IVV (5.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FRGN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQNasdaq Inc. | 0.72% | 0.06% | 0.66% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FRGN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FRGN or IVV?
FRGN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FRGN or IVV?
FRGN yields 0.21% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FRGN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FRGN is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.