FRGN vs VYM
Horizon International Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FRGN or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FRGN is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FRGN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $156M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.21% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 284 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +21.72%Best | +13.91% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.0%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 2, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FRGN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FRGN vs VYM Performance
Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) is an ETF from Horizon Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FRGN is up 21.72% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FRGN charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRGN currently yields 0.21% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of FRGN's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings FRGN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 283 positions we hold weights for in FRGN and 603 in VYM, against full books of 284 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 567 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FRGN (97.3% of the fund), and 11 for FRGN that do not appear in VYM (5.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FRGN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQNasdaq Inc. | 0.72% | 0.15% | 0.57% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FRGN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FRGN or VYM?
FRGN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FRGN or VYM?
FRGN yields 0.21% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FRGN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FRGN is less concentrated, with 21.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.