FRGN vs VXUS

FRGN vs VXUS

Which is better, FRGN or VXUS?

FRGN has been ahead.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FRGN led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns (1Y): FRGN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFRGNVXUS
Expense Ratio0.75%0.05%Best
AUM$176M$163.2B
Dividend Yield0.21%2.38%
Holdings5929,293
YTD Return+12.22%Best+6.50%
1Y Return+16.28%Best+12.09%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.15%
5Y Return (annualized)-+7.38%
Fund FamilyHorizon FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 2, 2025Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

FRGN vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FRGN vs VXUS Performance

Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) is an ETF from Horizon Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FRGN returned +16.28% while VXUS returned +12.09%. Year to date, FRGN is up 12.22% versus a gain of 6.50% for VXUS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FRGN charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRGN currently yields 0.21% against 2.38% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

FRGN already in VXUS71.7%

At least 71.7% of FRGN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of FRGN is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

190 positions in common, counted across the 282 positions we hold weights for in FRGN and 8,463 in VXUS, against full books of 592 and 9,293.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FRGNWeight in VXUSDifference
2330:TWTsmc4.23%4.24%0.01%
005930:KRSamsung Electronics (Equity)2.01%2.02%0.01%
SHELShell Plc2.77%0.62%2.15%
000660:KRSk Hynix Inc Common Stock KRW 50001.43%1.65%0.22%
ROP:SMRoche Ps Par Ag1.94%0.65%1.29%
TTE:PATotal Fina Elf Holdings Usa, Inc.1.64%0.38%1.26%
BBVA:MABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. Reg Shs1.35%0.35%1.00%
6501:JPHitachi Ltd1.29%0.34%0.95%
6098:JPRecruit Holdings Co. Ltd. Com Stk1.19%0.32%0.87%
SHOP:CAShopify Inc1.09%0.40%0.69%

71.7% of FRGN is already inside VXUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FRGNVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FRGN or VXUS?

FRGN has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FRGN or VXUS?

Over the past year FRGN returned +16.28% vs +12.09% for VXUS, so FRGN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FRGN and VXUS?

At least 71.7% of FRGN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 190 positions in common, counted across the 282 positions we hold weights for in FRGN and 8,463 in VXUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, FRGN or VXUS?

FRGN yields 0.21% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than FRGN?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FRGN led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.