FSPGX vs VXUS
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
FSPGX has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSPGX | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | - | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.39% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 395 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.45% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.79% | +26.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.74% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.05% | +9.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2016 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FSPGX vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) is a mutual fund from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSPGX returned +10.79% while VXUS returned +26.78%. Year to date, FSPGX is up 3.45% versus a gain of 15.23% for VXUS.
Over three years, FSPGX compounded at +21.74% per year against +20.86% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.05% and +9.66% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, FSPGX has the edge at +11.05% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FSPGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.5% for FSPGX and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSPGX charges 0.04% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSPGX currently yields 0.39% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FSPGX and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 8257 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSPGX or VXUS?
FSPGX has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VXUS charges 0.05%. FSPGX is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FSPGX or VXUS?
Over the past year FSPGX returned +10.79% vs +26.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FSPGX annualized +11.05% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FSPGX or VXUS?
FSPGX has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FSPGX -34.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FSPGX and VXUS?
FSPGX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FSPGX and VXUS?
FSPGX and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8257 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSPGX or VXUS?
FSPGX yields 0.39% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular Fund Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.