FSSL vs VOO

FSSL vs VOO

Which is better, FSSL or VOO?

High Yield Bond against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns (1Y): VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFSSLVOO
Expense Ratio6.98%0.03%Best
AUM$1.3B$1.0T
Dividend Yield10.40%1.05%
Holdings161519
YTD Return-6.82%+8.52%Best
1Y Return-1.47%+10.96%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.51%
5Y Return (annualized)-+10.97%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%13.8%Best
Fund FamilyFS Specialty Lending FundVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleHigh Yield BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 18, 2011Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

FSSL vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FSSL vs VOO Performance

FS Specialty Lending Fund (FSSL) is an ETF from FS Specialty Lending Fund and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSSL returned -1.47% while VOO returned +10.96%. Year to date, FSSL is down 6.82% versus a gain of 8.52% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 13.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.14. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FSSL charges 6.98% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $698 vs $3 annually, a gap of $695 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSSL currently yields 10.40% against 1.05% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 8 holdings in FSSL and 506 in VOO, totalling 9.7% and 100.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, FSSL as of Jun 30, 2026 and VOO as of Sep 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 8 positions we hold weights for in FSSL and 506 in VOO, against full books of 161 and 519.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FSSL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FSSLVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FSSL or VOO?

FSSL has an expense ratio of 6.98% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $695 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FSSL or VOO?

Over the past year FSSL returned -1.47% vs +10.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FSSL or VOO?

FSSL has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 13.8% for VOO.

Should I hold both FSSL and VOO?

FSSL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSSL or VOO?

FSSL yields 10.40% while VOO yields 1.05%, so FSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than FSSL?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.