FSTB vs IVV
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FSTB or IVV?
Short Term High Quality against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSTB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 421 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.59% | +12.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.75% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term High Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FSTB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSTB vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund ETF (FSTB) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FSTB is up 0.59% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSTB charges 0.20% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSTB currently yields 0.14% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 264 holdings in FSTB and 504 in IVV, totalling 46.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 264 positions we hold weights for in FSTB and 504 in IVV, against full books of 421 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSTB and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSTB or IVV?
FSTB has an expense ratio of 0.20% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSTB or IVV?
FSTB yields 0.14% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FSTB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.