FSTB vs VTI
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FSTB or VTI?
Short Term High Quality against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSTB | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 421 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.59% | +12.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term High Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FSTB vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSTB vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund ETF (FSTB) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FSTB is up 0.59% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSTB charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSTB currently yields 0.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 264 holdings in FSTB and 2,788 in VTI, totalling 46.5% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 264 positions we hold weights for in FSTB and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 421 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSTB and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSTB or VTI?
FSTB has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSTB or VTI?
FSTB yields 0.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FSTB?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.