FT vs QQQ
Franklin Universal Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
FT has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. FT offers more diversification with 704 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $212M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.88% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 704 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.52% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.12% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.44% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.55% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 1988 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FT vs QQQ Performance
Franklin Universal Trust (FT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FT returned +4.12% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, FT is up 0.52% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, FT compounded at +12.44% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +5.55% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 28-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 15.5% for FT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.3% for FT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FT charges 0.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $18 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FT currently yields 5.88% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FT and QQQ share 4 holdings out of 405 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FT or QQQ?
FT has an expense ratio of 0.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. FT is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FT or QQQ?
Over the past year FT returned +4.12% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (28 years), FT annualized +0.73% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 15.5% for FT. Worst drawdown: FT -70.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FT and QQQ?
FT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FT and QQQ?
FT and QQQ share 4 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 405 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FT or QQQ?
FT yields 5.88% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.