FT vs VOO
Franklin Universal Trust vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FT or VOO?
Debt-oriented balanced against Large Cap Blend.
FT has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $212M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.95% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 704 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -3.61% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.54% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.35% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 14.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,373 | $18,490Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Debt-oriented balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 1988 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 17, 2026 (16 years).
FT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
FT vs VOO Performance
Franklin Universal Trust (FT) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FT returned +0.54% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, FT is down 3.61% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, FT compounded at +10.23% per year against +21.25% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.35% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.38% annualized vs +3.51%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 12.4% for FT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.2% for FT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FT charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FT currently yields 5.95% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.1% of VOO's money is in holdings FT also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for FT, our book for it lists positions totalling 114.3% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
VOO and FT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 153 days apart, FT as of Feb 28, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
26 positions in common, counted across the 307 positions we hold weights for in FT and 494 in VOO, against full books of 704 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 4.74% | 0.28% | 4.46% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 3.81% | 0.09% | 3.72% |
| ETREntergy Corp. | 2.82% | 0.08% | 2.74% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 2.65% | 0.03% | 2.62% |
| LNTAlliant Energy Corp. | 2.54% | 0.03% | 2.51% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 2.30% | 0.15% | 2.15% |
| CNPCenterpoint Energy Inc. | 2.35% | 0.04% | 2.31% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 2.14% | 0.17% | 1.97% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 2.12% | 0.11% | 2.01% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 2.06% | 0.03% | 2.03% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FT or VOO?
FT has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. FT is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FT or VOO?
Over the past year FT returned +0.54% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), FT annualized +3.51% vs +13.38% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 12.4% for FT. Worst drawdown: FT -41.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FT and VOO?
FT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FT and VOO?
At least 2.1% of VOO's money is in holdings FT also owns. Our book for FT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 307 positions we hold weights for in FT and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FT or VOO?
FT yields 5.95% while VOO yields 1.04%, so FT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FT?
FT has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.