FTG vs JMID

FTG vs JMID

Which is better, FTG or JMID?

JMID costs less.

JMID has a lower expense ratio. JMID is less concentrated, with 26.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.3%.

Lower Fees: JMIDLess Concentrated: JMID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFTGJMID
Expense Ratio0.79%0.30%Best
AUM$6M$19M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.52%
Holdings96192
YTD Return-16.47%-1.56%Best
1Y Return--1.16%
Top 10 Weight31.3%26.5%Best
Fund FamilyFuller & Thaler Asset ManagementJanus Henderson Investors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthMid Cap Growth
InceptionAug 18, 2026Sep 17, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FTG vs JMID growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare FTG against instead:FTG vs SPYFTG vs QQQFTG vs VOOFTG vs VTIJMID against:JMID vs VXUS

FTG vs JMID Performance

FullerThaler Behavioral Growth ETF (FTG) is an ETF from Fuller & Thaler Asset Management and Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors. Year to date, FTG is down 16.47% versus a loss of 1.56% for JMID.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FTG charges 0.79% per year while JMID charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $30 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTG currently yields 0.00% against 0.52% for JMID.

Holdings Overlap

FTG already in JMID34.5%
JMID already in FTG14.9%

34.5% of FTG's money is in holdings JMID also owns. 14.9% of JMID's money is in holdings FTG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in FTG and 94 in JMID, against full books of 96 and 192.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 76 positions for JMID that do not appear in our book for FTG (82.0% of the fund), and 32 for FTG that do not appear in JMID (63.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FTGWeight in JMIDDifference
TEAMAtlassian Corp-Cl A4.94%1.48%3.46%
DXCMDexcom Inc.2.92%2.38%0.54%
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.3.12%1.53%1.59%
SNOWSnowflake Inc2.96%1.63%1.33%
KEYSKeysight Technologies Inc.2.16%2.19%0.03%
AFRMAffirm Inc2.30%1.55%0.75%
XPOXpo Logistics Inc.1.67%1.48%0.19%
NTRANatera Inc2.73%0.13%2.60%
NVT:IENvent Electric Plc Ordinary Shares1.72%0.45%1.27%
LSCCLattice Semiconductor Corp.1.58%0.58%1.00%

34.5% of FTG is already inside JMID.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FTGJMID

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FTG or JMID?

FTG has an expense ratio of 0.79% while JMID charges 0.30%. JMID is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FTG and JMID?

34.5% of FTG's money is in holdings JMID also owns. 14.9% of JMID's is in holdings FTG also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in FTG and 94 in JMID.

Which pays a higher dividend, FTG or JMID?

FTG yields 0.00% while JMID yields 0.52%, so JMID currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JMID better than FTG?

JMID has a lower expense ratio. JMID is less concentrated, with 26.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.