FTHF vs IVV
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTHF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTHF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $123M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +38.63% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +77.35% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FTHF vs IVV Performance
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, FTHF is up 38.63% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTHF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for FTHF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTHF charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTHF currently yields 3.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTHF and IVV share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTHF or IVV?
FTHF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTHF or IVV?
Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% vs +21.79% for IVV, so FTHF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTHF annualized +40.10% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTHF or IVV?
FTHF has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTHF -21.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTHF and IVV?
FTHF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTHF and IVV?
FTHF and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTHF or IVV?
FTHF yields 3.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FTHF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.