FTHF vs QQQ
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FTHF delivered stronger 1-year returns. FTHF offers more diversification with 109 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTHF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $123M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +38.63% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +77.35% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FTHF vs QQQ Performance
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, FTHF is up 38.63% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.8% for FTHF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for FTHF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTHF charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTHF currently yields 3.28% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FTHF and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 201 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTHF or QQQ?
FTHF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTHF or QQQ?
Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so FTHF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTHF annualized +40.10% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTHF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.8% for FTHF. Worst drawdown: FTHF -21.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FTHF and QQQ?
FTHF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTHF and QQQ?
FTHF and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 201 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTHF or QQQ?
FTHF yields 3.28% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FTHF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.