FTHF vs SPY
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. FTHF delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTHF | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $123M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +38.63% | +14.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +77.35% | +21.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
FTHF vs SPY Performance
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% while SPY returned +21.71%. Year to date, FTHF is up 38.63% versus a gain of 14.24% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTHF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for FTHF and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTHF charges 0.75% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $9 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTHF currently yields 3.28% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
FTHF and SPY share 0 holdings out of 603 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTHF or SPY?
FTHF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTHF or SPY?
Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% vs +21.71% for SPY, so FTHF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTHF annualized +40.10% vs +8.86% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTHF or SPY?
FTHF has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: FTHF -21.1% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTHF and SPY?
FTHF and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTHF and SPY?
FTHF and SPY share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 603 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTHF or SPY?
FTHF yields 3.28% while SPY yields 1.01%, so FTHF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.