FTHF vs VTI
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FTHF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTHF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $123M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +38.63% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +77.35% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
FTHF vs VTI Performance
First Trust Emerging Markets Human Flourishing ETF (FTHF) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, FTHF is up 38.63% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTHF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.1% for FTHF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTHF charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTHF currently yields 3.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FTHF and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2885 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTHF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASAN | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTHF or VTI?
FTHF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTHF or VTI?
Over the past year FTHF returned +77.35% vs +22.43% for VTI, so FTHF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTHF annualized +40.10% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTHF or VTI?
FTHF has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FTHF -21.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FTHF and VTI?
FTHF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTHF and VTI?
FTHF and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2885 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTHF or VTI?
FTHF yields 3.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FTHF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.