FTWO vs QQQ
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. FTWO delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $76M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.71% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.67% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.77% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FTWO vs QQQ Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +30.67% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, FTWO is up 13.71% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +24.77% per year against +25.75% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, FTWO has the edge at +24.77% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.1% for FTWO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 0.94% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or QQQ?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTWO or QQQ?
Over the past year FTWO returned +30.67% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so FTWO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTWO annualized +24.77% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTWO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.1% for FTWO. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FTWO and QQQ?
FTWO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and QQQ?
FTWO and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or QQQ?
FTWO yields 0.94% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FTWO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.