FTWO vs VOO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FTWO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $76M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.48% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.29% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.99% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FTWO vs VOO Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +27.29% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, FTWO is up 11.48% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +23.99% per year against +22.09% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, FTWO has the edge at +23.99% annualized vs +13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 0.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FTWO and VOO share 23 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or VOO?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTWO or VOO?
Over the past year FTWO returned +27.29% vs +20.69% for VOO, so FTWO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTWO annualized +23.99% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTWO or VOO?
FTWO has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FTWO and VOO?
FTWO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and VOO?
FTWO and VOO share 23 common holdings with a 4.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or VOO?
FTWO yields 0.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.