FTWO vs VOO
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTWO or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FTWO led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $78M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.05% | +13.31%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.59% | +17.07%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.64%Best | +22.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $18,988Best | $17,904 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.8% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 31, 2023 to Sep 23, 2026 (3.1 years).
FTWO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
FTWO vs VOO Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +16.59% while VOO returned +17.07%. Year to date, FTWO is up 11.05% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +24.64% per year against +22.72% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 0.86% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
67.9% of FTWO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.2% of VOO's money is in holdings FTWO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FTWO and 494 in VOO, against full books of 54 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 464 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FTWO (94.0% of the fund), and 13 for FTWO that do not appear in VOO (8.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTWO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 10.66% | 0.23% | 10.43% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 8.10% | 0.13% | 7.97% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 7.08% | 1.00% | 6.08% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 5.04% | 0.58% | 4.46% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 4.51% | 0.16% | 4.35% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.05% | 0.57% | 3.48% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 4.03% | 0.45% | 3.58% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 3.63% | 0.14% | 3.49% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 3.67% | 0.08% | 3.59% |
| BABoeing Co | 2.36% | 0.26% | 2.10% |
67.9% of FTWO is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or VOO?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTWO or VOO?
Over the past year FTWO returned +16.59% vs +17.07% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTWO or VOO?
FTWO has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both FTWO and VOO?
FTWO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and VOO?
67.9% of FTWO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.2% of VOO's is in holdings FTWO also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FTWO and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or VOO?
FTWO yields 0.86% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FTWO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FTWO led over 3Y and the full window, VOO over 1Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.