FTWO vs VYM
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FTWO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $73M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +10.88% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.95% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.89% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FTWO vs VYM Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +24.95% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, FTWO is up 10.88% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +23.89% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, FTWO has the edge at +23.89% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 1.01% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FTWO and VYM share 17 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or VYM?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTWO or VYM?
Over the past year FTWO returned +24.95% vs +24.43% for VYM, so FTWO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTWO annualized +23.89% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTWO or VYM?
FTWO has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FTWO and VYM?
FTWO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and VYM?
FTWO and VYM share 17 common holdings with a 8.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or VYM?
FTWO yields 1.01% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.