FTWO vs IVV
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTWO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $73M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.88% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.95% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.89% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
FTWO vs IVV Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +24.95% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, FTWO is up 10.88% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +23.89% per year against +21.80% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, FTWO has the edge at +23.89% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 1.01% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTWO and IVV share 23 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or IVV?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTWO or IVV?
Over the past year FTWO returned +24.95% vs +22.02% for IVV, so FTWO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FTWO annualized +23.89% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTWO or IVV?
FTWO has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTWO and IVV?
FTWO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and IVV?
FTWO and IVV share 23 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or IVV?
FTWO yields 1.01% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.