FTWO vs VTI
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FTWO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FTWO led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTWO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $75M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.01% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.19% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.22%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $18,373Best | $17,639 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 31, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (3.1 years).
FTWO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
FTWO vs VTI Performance
Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTWO returned +13.19% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, FTWO is up 8.01% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, FTWO compounded at +25.22% per year against +23.41% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTWO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for FTWO and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTWO charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTWO currently yields 0.86% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
76.8% of FTWO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 5.0% of VTI's money is in holdings FTWO also owns.
Most of FTWO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
36 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FTWO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 52 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,117 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FTWO (92.4% of the fund), and 1 for FTWO that do not appear in VTI (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTWO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 11.51% | 0.21% | 11.30% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 9.23% | 0.12% | 9.11% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 7.18% | 0.89% | 6.29% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 4.58% | 0.52% | 4.06% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.23% | 0.52% | 3.71% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 4.11% | 0.14% | 3.97% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 3.66% | 0.40% | 3.26% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 3.72% | 0.07% | 3.65% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 3.13% | 0.12% | 3.01% |
| BABoeing Co | 2.30% | 0.24% | 2.06% |
76.8% of FTWO is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTWO or VTI?
FTWO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTWO or VTI?
Over the past year FTWO returned +13.19% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTWO or VTI?
FTWO has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FTWO -18.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FTWO and VTI?
FTWO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTWO and VTI?
76.8% of FTWO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 5.0% of VTI's is in holdings FTWO also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in FTWO and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTWO or VTI?
FTWO yields 0.86% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FTWO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FTWO led over 3Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.