FUTY vs VTI
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FUTY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.65% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.25% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.81% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.07% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
FUTY vs VTI Performance
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FUTY returned +2.81% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, FUTY is up 0.25% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, FUTY compounded at +14.07% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.7% for FUTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.1% for FUTY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FUTY charges 0.08% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FUTY currently yields 2.65% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FUTY and VTI share 51 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FUTY or VTI?
FUTY has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FUTY or VTI?
Over the past year FUTY returned +2.81% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FUTY annualized +7.64% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FUTY or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.7% for FUTY. Worst drawdown: FUTY -37.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FUTY and VTI?
FUTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FUTY and VTI?
FUTY and VTI share 51 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FUTY or VTI?
FUTY yields 2.65% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FUTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.