FXH vs VTI
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FXH or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FXH led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 148 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.13%Best | +11.65% |
| 1Y Return | +20.61%Best | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.84% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.89% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.7%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,453 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 10, 2007 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.3 years).
FXH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.3 years both funds cover.
FXH vs VTI Performance
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FXH returned +20.61% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, FXH is up 13.13% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, FXH compounded at +8.84% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.89% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, FXH has the edge at +10.25% annualized vs +9.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FXH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.7% for FXH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXH charges 0.61% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXH currently yields 0.77% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 87.2% of FXH's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of FXH is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, FXH as of Sep 1, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
62 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in FXH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 148 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FXH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.56% | 1.40% | 0.16% |
| REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 2.77% | 0.09% | 2.68% |
| PFEPfizer, Inc. | 2.56% | 0.19% | 2.37% |
| NTRANatera Inc | 2.57% | 0.05% | 2.52% |
| SOLVSolventum Corp | 2.55% | 0.02% | 2.53% |
| BSXBoston Scientific Corp. | 2.45% | 0.09% | 2.36% |
| ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. | 2.51% | 0.02% | 2.49% |
| UHSUniversal Health Services Inc. | 2.48% | 0.01% | 2.47% |
| THCTenet Healthcare Corp. | 2.30% | 0.02% | 2.28% |
| GHGuardant Health Inc | 2.29% | 0.03% | 2.26% |
87.2% of FXH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXH or VTI?
FXH has an expense ratio of 0.61% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FXH or VTI?
Over the past year FXH returned +20.61% vs +17.34% for VTI, so FXH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXH annualized +10.25% vs +9.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FXH or VTI?
FXH has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FXH -43.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FXH and VTI?
FXH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FXH and VTI?
At least 87.2% of FXH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 62 positions in common, counted across the 73 positions we hold weights for in FXH and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXH or VTI?
FXH yields 0.77% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FXH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FXH led over 1Y and the full window, VTI over 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.