FXR vs VTI
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FXR or VTI?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $735M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.66% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 312 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +7.36% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.75% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.36% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.43% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.3% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.0% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,988 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 10, 2007 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.3 years).
FXR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.3 years both funds cover.
FXR vs VTI Performance
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FXR returned +10.75% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, FXR is up 7.36% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, FXR compounded at +14.36% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.43% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.25% annualized vs +8.15%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FXR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.0% for FXR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXR charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXR currently yields 0.66% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 80.4% of FXR's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of FXR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
125 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in FXR and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 312 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FXR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.67% | 0.21% |
| PYPLPaypay Holdings, Inc. | 1.45% | 0.05% | 1.40% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.88% | 0.54% | 0.34% |
| VNTVontier Corp | 1.25% | 0.00% | 1.25% |
| FISFidelity National Information Srvcs Inc | 1.19% | 0.03% | 1.16% |
| FIFiserv, Inc. (United States) | 1.19% | 0.03% | 1.16% |
| MHKMohawk Industries Inc. | 1.21% | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| SUNBSunbelt Rentals | 1.15% | 0.04% | 1.11% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.75% | 0.43% | 0.32% |
| PWRQuanta | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.87% |
80.4% of FXR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXR or VTI?
FXR has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FXR or VTI?
Over the past year FXR returned +10.75% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXR annualized +8.15% vs +9.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FXR or VTI?
FXR has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FXR -64.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FXR and VTI?
FXR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FXR and VTI?
At least 80.4% of FXR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 125 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in FXR and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXR or VTI?
FXR yields 0.66% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FXR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.