GBUG vs IVV
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GBUG or IVV?
Precious Metals against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GBUG led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBUG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $178M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 45 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.79% | +14.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.28%Best | +16.68% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.33% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.92% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 48.4% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -18.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $22,823Best | $12,912 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.8% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Precious Metals | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 20, 2025 to Oct 5, 2026 (1.6 years).
GBUG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
GBUG vs IVV Performance
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GBUG returned +19.28% while IVV returned +16.68%. Year to date, GBUG is up 6.79% versus a gain of 14.35% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.4% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for GBUG and -18.4% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.10. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBUG charges 0.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBUG currently yields 1.32% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
3.2% of GBUG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings GBUG also owns.
GBUG and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GBUG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 45 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GBUG (99.0% of the fund), and 4 for GBUG that do not appear in IVV (13.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBUG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.24% | 0.20% | 3.04% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GBUG and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBUG or IVV?
GBUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GBUG or IVV?
Over the past year GBUG returned +19.28% vs +16.68% for IVV, so GBUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GBUG annualized +67.49% vs +17.32% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GBUG or IVV?
GBUG has been the more volatile fund at 48.4% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GBUG -37.4% vs IVV -18.4%.
Should I hold both GBUG and IVV?
GBUG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.10, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GBUG and IVV?
3.2% of GBUG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings GBUG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GBUG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBUG or IVV?
GBUG yields 1.32% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GBUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GBUG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GBUG led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.