GBUG vs IVV
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GBUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBUG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $170M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +23.69% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +91.03% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GBUG vs IVV Performance
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GBUG returned +91.03% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, GBUG is up 23.69% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for GBUG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBUG charges 0.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBUG currently yields 1.75% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GBUG and IVV share 1 holdings out of 549 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBUG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 3.10% | 0.15% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBUG or IVV?
GBUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBUG or IVV?
Over the past year GBUG returned +91.03% vs +21.89% for IVV, so GBUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GBUG annualized +92.77% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBUG or IVV?
GBUG has been the more volatile fund at 51.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GBUG -37.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GBUG and IVV?
GBUG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GBUG and IVV?
GBUG and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBUG or IVV?
GBUG yields 1.75% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GBUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.