GBUG vs VYM
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GBUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBUG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $170M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +20.67% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +90.33% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GBUG vs VYM Performance
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBUG returned +90.33% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, GBUG is up 20.67% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for GBUG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBUG charges 0.90% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $4 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBUG currently yields 1.75% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GBUG and VYM share 1 holdings out of 647 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBUG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 3.10% | 0.41% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBUG or VYM?
GBUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBUG or VYM?
Over the past year GBUG returned +90.33% vs +22.16% for VYM, so GBUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GBUG annualized +89.84% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBUG or VYM?
GBUG has been the more volatile fund at 50.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GBUG -37.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GBUG and VYM?
GBUG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GBUG and VYM?
GBUG and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 647 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBUG or VYM?
GBUG yields 1.75% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.