GBUG vs VYM
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GBUG or VYM?
Precious Metals against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GBUG led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBUG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $178M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 45 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +6.37% | +9.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.85%Best | +12.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.39% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 48.5% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -14.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $22,863Best | $12,039 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Precious Metals | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 20, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.6 years).
GBUG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
GBUG vs VYM Performance
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBUG returned +22.85% while VYM returned +12.81%. Year to date, GBUG is up 6.37% versus a gain of 9.22% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.5% compared with 10.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for GBUG and -14.2% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBUG charges 0.90% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $4 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBUG currently yields 1.32% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
3.2% of GBUG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.4% of VYM's money is in holdings GBUG also owns.
GBUG and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GBUG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 45 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 527 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GBUG (96.7% of the fund), and 4 for GBUG that do not appear in VYM (13.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBUG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 3.24% | 0.41% | 2.83% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GBUG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBUG or VYM?
GBUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GBUG or VYM?
Over the past year GBUG returned +22.85% vs +12.81% for VYM, so GBUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GBUG annualized +67.67% vs +12.30% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GBUG or VYM?
GBUG has been the more volatile fund at 48.5% annualized versus 10.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GBUG -37.4% vs VYM -14.2%.
Should I hold both GBUG and VYM?
GBUG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GBUG and VYM?
3.2% of GBUG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.4% of VYM's is in holdings GBUG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in GBUG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBUG or VYM?
GBUG yields 1.32% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GBUG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GBUG led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.