GBUG vs VOO
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GBUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBUG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $170M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.67% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +90.33% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 50.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GBUG vs VOO Performance
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBUG returned +90.33% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, GBUG is up 20.67% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 50.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for GBUG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBUG charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBUG currently yields 1.75% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GBUG and VOO share 1 holdings out of 549 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GBUG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 3.10% | 0.15% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBUG or VOO?
GBUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBUG or VOO?
Over the past year GBUG returned +90.33% vs +20.92% for VOO, so GBUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GBUG annualized +89.84% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBUG or VOO?
GBUG has been the more volatile fund at 50.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GBUG -37.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GBUG and VOO?
GBUG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GBUG and VOO?
GBUG and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 549 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBUG or VOO?
GBUG yields 1.75% while VOO yields 1.08%, so GBUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.