GBUG vs VTI
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GBUG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBUG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $170M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.69% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +91.03% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GBUG vs VTI Performance
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBUG returned +91.03% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GBUG is up 23.69% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GBUG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for GBUG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.07. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBUG charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBUG currently yields 1.75% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GBUG and VTI share 3 holdings out of 2829 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBUG or VTI?
GBUG has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBUG or VTI?
Over the past year GBUG returned +91.03% vs +22.35% for VTI, so GBUG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GBUG annualized +92.77% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBUG or VTI?
GBUG has been the more volatile fund at 51.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GBUG -37.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GBUG and VTI?
GBUG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.07, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GBUG and VTI?
GBUG and VTI share 3 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2829 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBUG or VTI?
GBUG yields 1.75% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GBUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.