GEND vs IVV
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GEND delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEND | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.67% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +19.11% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.55% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GEND vs IVV Performance
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is a ETF from Genter Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GEND returned +25.55% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, GEND is up 19.11% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.3% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for GEND and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEND charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEND currently yields 2.67% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GEND and IVV share 29 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEND or IVV?
GEND has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GEND or IVV?
Over the past year GEND returned +25.55% vs +21.62% for IVV, so GEND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEND annualized +23.72% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GEND or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.3% for GEND. Worst drawdown: GEND -13.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GEND and IVV?
GEND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GEND and IVV?
GEND and IVV share 29 common holdings with a 8.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEND or IVV?
GEND yields 2.67% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.