GEND vs IVV
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GEND or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEND | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +16.71%Best | +12.24% |
| 1Y Return | +21.98%Best | +18.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.3%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,888Best | $13,462 |
| Top 10 Weight | 39.5% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Genter Capital Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 13, 2025 to Sep 9, 2026 (1.7 years).
GEND vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
GEND vs IVV Performance
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF (GEND) is an ETF from Genter Capital Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GEND returned +21.98% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, GEND is up 16.71% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 10.2% for GEND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.3% for GEND and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEND charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEND currently yields 2.59% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
86.3% of GEND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 8.4% of IVV's money is in holdings GEND also owns.
Most of GEND is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
28 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 505 in IVV, against full books of 33 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 467 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GEND (91.0% of the fund), and 2 for GEND that do not appear in IVV (4.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GEND | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 4.04% | 1.45% | 2.59% |
| NTRSNorthern Trust Corp. | 4.74% | 0.05% | 4.69% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 3.84% | 0.52% | 3.32% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp. | 3.95% | 0.19% | 3.76% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 3.64% | 0.48% | 3.16% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 3.93% | 0.07% | 3.86% |
| MTBM&t Bank Corp. | 3.89% | 0.06% | 3.83% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 3.82% | 0.12% | 3.70% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 3.58% | 0.17% | 3.41% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.64% | 0.93% | 1.71% |
86.3% of GEND is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEND or IVV?
GEND has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GEND or IVV?
Over the past year GEND returned +21.98% vs +18.61% for IVV, so GEND leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEND annualized +21.31% vs +19.11% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GEND or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 10.2% for GEND. Worst drawdown: GEND -13.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GEND and IVV?
GEND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GEND and IVV?
86.3% of GEND's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 8.4% of IVV's is in holdings GEND also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in GEND and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEND or IVV?
GEND yields 2.59% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GEND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GEND?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GEND led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.