GLCR vs IVV
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLCR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -7.28% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.98% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GLCR vs IVV Performance
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) is a ETF from Teucrium and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLCR returned -3.98% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, GLCR is down 7.28% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for GLCR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLCR charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLCR currently yields 1.11% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GLCR and IVV share 0 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLCR or IVV?
GLCR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLCR or IVV?
Over the past year GLCR returned -3.98% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLCR annualized +0.34% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLCR or IVV?
GLCR has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GLCR -19.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GLCR and IVV?
GLCR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLCR and IVV?
GLCR and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLCR or IVV?
GLCR yields 1.11% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GLCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.