GLCR vs VTI
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLCR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -7.13% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.40% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GLCR vs VTI Performance
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLCR returned -3.40% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, GLCR is down 7.13% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for GLCR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLCR charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLCR currently yields 1.11% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GLCR and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLCR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBTM | 4.07% | 0.01% | 4.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLCR or VTI?
GLCR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLCR or VTI?
Over the past year GLCR returned -3.40% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLCR annualized +0.45% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLCR or VTI?
GLCR has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GLCR -19.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GLCR and VTI?
GLCR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLCR and VTI?
GLCR and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLCR or VTI?
GLCR yields 1.11% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GLCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.