GLCR vs QQQ
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLCR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -7.28% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.98% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GLCR vs QQQ Performance
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) is a ETF from Teucrium and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GLCR returned -3.98% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, GLCR is down 7.28% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.5% for GLCR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for GLCR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLCR charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLCR currently yields 1.11% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GLCR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 134 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLCR or QQQ?
GLCR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLCR or QQQ?
Over the past year GLCR returned -3.98% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLCR annualized +0.34% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLCR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.5% for GLCR. Worst drawdown: GLCR -19.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GLCR and QQQ?
GLCR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLCR and QQQ?
GLCR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 134 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLCR or QQQ?
GLCR yields 1.11% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so GLCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.