GLCR vs VYM
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLCR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -7.78% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.28% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 26, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLCR vs VYM Performance
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLCR returned -3.28% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GLCR is down 7.78% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for GLCR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLCR charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLCR currently yields 1.11% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLCR and VYM share 0 holdings out of 589 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLCR or VYM?
GLCR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLCR or VYM?
Over the past year GLCR returned -3.28% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GLCR annualized -0.05% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLCR or VYM?
GLCR has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GLCR -19.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLCR and VYM?
GLCR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLCR and VYM?
GLCR and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 589 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLCR or VYM?
GLCR yields 1.11% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.