GLDN vs IVV
Nicholas Gold Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLDN or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 87.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.27% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 46 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -11.28% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 87.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | XFunds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GLDN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDN vs IVV Performance
Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) is an ETF from XFunds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, GLDN is down 11.28% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDN charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDN currently yields 7.27% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
4.6% of GLDN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings GLDN also owns.
GLDN and IVV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 14 positions we hold weights for in GLDN and 505 in IVV, against full books of 46 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GLDN (99.2% of the fund), and 5 for GLDN that do not appear in IVV (60.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLDN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 4.61% | 0.17% | 4.44% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDN or IVV?
GLDN has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GLDN and IVV?
4.6% of GLDN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings GLDN also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 14 positions we hold weights for in GLDN and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDN or IVV?
GLDN yields 7.27% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GLDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GLDN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 87.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.