GLDN vs VOO
Nicholas Gold Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLDN or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 87.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.27% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 46 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -8.61% | +12.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +18.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Top 10 Weight | 87.8% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | XFunds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GLDN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDN vs VOO Performance
Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) is an ETF from XFunds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GLDN is down 8.61% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDN charges 1.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDN currently yields 7.27% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
4.6% of GLDN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings GLDN also owns.
GLDN and VOO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, GLDN as of Aug 19, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 14 positions we hold weights for in GLDN and 505 in VOO, against full books of 46 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GLDN (99.3% of the fund), and 5 for GLDN that do not appear in VOO (60.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLDN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 4.61% | 0.15% | 4.46% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDN or VOO?
GLDN has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GLDN and VOO?
4.6% of GLDN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings GLDN also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 14 positions we hold weights for in GLDN and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDN or VOO?
GLDN yields 7.27% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GLDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GLDN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 87.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.