GLDN vs QQQ
Nicholas Gold Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GLDN or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 87.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.27% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 46 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -10.40% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| Top 10 Weight | 87.8% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | XFunds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 18, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GLDN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDN vs QQQ Performance
Nicholas Gold Income ETF (GLDN) is an ETF from XFunds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, GLDN is down 10.40% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDN charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDN currently yields 7.27% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 14 holdings in GLDN and 102 in QQQ, totalling 100.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 14 positions we hold weights for in GLDN and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 46 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 95 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GLDN (97.0% of the fund), and 6 for GLDN that do not appear in QQQ (65.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDN or QQQ?
GLDN has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDN or QQQ?
GLDN yields 7.27% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GLDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GLDN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 87.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.