GLOW vs HCOM
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. HCOM offers more diversification with 55 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $63M | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | +14.31% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.58% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Sep 14, 2021 |
GLOW vs HCOM Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year GLOW returned +25.58% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, GLOW is up 14.31% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $59 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.28% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or HCOM?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while HCOM charges 0.59%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or HCOM?
Over the past year GLOW returned +25.58% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.77% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or HCOM?
HCOM has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both GLOW and HCOM?
GLOW and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or HCOM?
GLOW yields 1.28% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so HCOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.