GLOW vs VTI
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $68M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.69% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.11% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GLOW vs VTI Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLOW returned +23.11% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GLOW is up 13.69% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.6% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.41% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2800 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLOW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STT | 3.25% | 0.06% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or VTI?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or VTI?
Over the past year GLOW returned +23.11% vs +21.39% for VTI, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.11% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.6% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GLOW and VTI?
GLOW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and VTI?
GLOW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2800 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or VTI?
GLOW yields 1.41% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.