GLOW vs IVV
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $68M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.42% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.82% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GLOW vs IVV Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLOW returned +23.82% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, GLOW is up 14.42% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $3 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.41% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and IVV share 1 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GLOW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STT | 3.25% | 0.08% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or IVV?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or IVV?
Over the past year GLOW returned +23.82% vs +21.62% for IVV, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.49% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GLOW and IVV?
GLOW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and IVV?
GLOW and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or IVV?
GLOW yields 1.41% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.