GLOW vs VYM
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $63M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.14% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.00% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GLOW vs VYM Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLOW returned +25.00% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GLOW is up 14.14% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $4 annually, a gap of $68 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.28% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 573 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or VYM?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $68 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or VYM?
Over the past year GLOW returned +25.00% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.57% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GLOW and VYM?
GLOW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and VYM?
GLOW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or VYM?
GLOW yields 1.28% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.