GLOW vs HUSV
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
HUSV has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. HUSV offers more diversification with 101 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $63M | $74M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.37% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +14.61% | +7.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.02% | +5.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Aug 24, 2016 |
GLOW vs HUSV Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year GLOW returned +24.02% while HUSV returned +5.19%. Year to date, GLOW is up 14.61% versus a gain of 7.92% for HUSV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $70 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.28% against 1.37% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and HUSV share 0 holdings out of 116 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or HUSV?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while HUSV charges 0.70%. HUSV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or HUSV?
Over the past year GLOW returned +24.02% vs +5.19% for HUSV, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.78% vs +8.44% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or HUSV?
HUSV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both GLOW and HUSV?
GLOW and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and HUSV?
GLOW and HUSV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 116 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or HUSV?
GLOW yields 1.28% while HUSV yields 1.37%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.