GLOW vs IZRL
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IZRL offers more diversification with 66 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $63M | $142M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 2.55% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +15.25% | +0.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.92% | +11.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +0.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.8% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Dec 4, 2017 |
GLOW vs IZRL Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year GLOW returned +23.92% while IZRL returned +11.14%. Year to date, GLOW is up 15.25% versus a gain of 0.27% for IZRL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 10.8% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $49 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.28% against 2.55% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 81 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or IZRL?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or IZRL?
Over the past year GLOW returned +23.92% vs +11.14% for IZRL, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +20.06% vs +5.51% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or IZRL?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 10.8% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both GLOW and IZRL?
GLOW and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and IZRL?
GLOW and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 81 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or IZRL?
GLOW yields 1.28% while IZRL yields 2.55%, so IZRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.