GLOW vs SAWS
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF vs AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
SAWS has a lower expense ratio. GLOW delivered stronger 1-year returns. SAWS offers more diversification with 71 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLOW | SAWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.72% | 0.55% | |
| AUM | $63M | $8M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 0.02% | |
| Holdings | 16 | 72 | |
| YTD Return | +14.14% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.00% | +22.18% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 18.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.6% | -22.0% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Jul 30, 2024 |
GLOW vs SAWS Performance
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF (GLOW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc.. Over the past year GLOW returned +25.00% while SAWS returned +22.18%. Year to date, GLOW is up 14.14% versus a gain of 15.23% for SAWS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAWS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 10.7% for GLOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.6% for GLOW and -22.0% for SAWS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLOW charges 0.72% per year while SAWS charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $55 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLOW currently yields 1.28% against 0.02% for SAWS.
Holdings Overlap
GLOW and SAWS share 0 holdings out of 86 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLOW or SAWS?
GLOW has an expense ratio of 0.72% while SAWS charges 0.55%. SAWS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GLOW or SAWS?
Over the past year GLOW returned +25.00% vs +22.18% for SAWS, so GLOW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GLOW annualized +19.57% vs +13.04% for SAWS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GLOW or SAWS?
SAWS has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 10.7% for GLOW. Worst drawdown: GLOW -15.6% vs SAWS -22.0%.
Should I hold both GLOW and SAWS?
GLOW and SAWS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GLOW and SAWS?
GLOW and SAWS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 86 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLOW or SAWS?
GLOW yields 1.28% while SAWS yields 0.02%, so GLOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.