GNT vs SCHD
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, GNT or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GNT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over the full window. GNT is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNT | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.18% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $183M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.09% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 281 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +30.83%Best | +28.59% |
| 1Y Return | +45.84%Best | +31.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.63%Best | +16.70% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.76%Best | +10.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -85.1% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $24,635Best | $16,171 |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.1%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 3, 2026 (14.9 years).
GNT vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
GNT vs SCHD Performance
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust (GNT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GNT returned +45.84% while SCHD returned +31.77%. Year to date, GNT is up 30.83% versus a gain of 28.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, GNT compounded at +31.63% per year against +16.70% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +19.76% and +10.09% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.59% annualized vs -0.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.1% for GNT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNT charges 1.18% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $118 vs $6 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNT currently yields 8.09% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
9.5% of GNT's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 14.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings GNT also owns.
SCHD and GNT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 129 days apart, GNT as of Mar 31, 2026 and SCHD as of Aug 7, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
8 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in GNT and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 281 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GNT (85.0% of the fund), and 36 for GNT that do not appear in SCHD (45.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GNT | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.68% | 3.74% | 1.06% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 1.14% | 3.59% | 2.45% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 2.22% | 0.92% | 1.30% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 1.08% | 1.80% | 0.72% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.97% | 1.89% | 0.92% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.77% | 1.36% | 0.59% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | 0.40% | 1.24% | 0.84% |
| APAApa Corp | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.08% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GNT and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNT or SCHD?
GNT has an expense ratio of 1.18% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GNT or SCHD?
Over the past year GNT returned +45.84% vs +31.77% for SCHD, so GNT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GNT annualized -0.44% vs +11.59% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GNT or SCHD?
GNT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GNT -85.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GNT and SCHD?
GNT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GNT and SCHD?
14.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings GNT also owns. 14.9% of SCHD's is in holdings GNT also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in GNT and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNT or SCHD?
GNT yields 8.09% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so GNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than GNT?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GNT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over the full window. GNT is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.