GNT vs SCHD
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. GNT delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNT | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.18% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $163M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.95% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +23.88% | +25.33% | |
| 1Y Return | +46.40% | +32.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.64% | +15.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.17% | +9.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Oct 20, 2011 |
GNT vs SCHD Performance
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust (GNT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GNT returned +46.40% while SCHD returned +32.31%. Year to date, GNT is up 23.88% versus a gain of 25.33% for SCHD.
Over three years, GNT compounded at +28.64% per year against +15.40% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +19.17% and +9.70% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.45% annualized vs -2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for GNT and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNT charges 1.18% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $118 vs $6 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNT currently yields 7.95% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
GNT and SCHD share 8 holdings out of 180 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNT or SCHD?
GNT has an expense ratio of 1.18% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $112 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GNT or SCHD?
Over the past year GNT returned +46.40% vs +32.31% for SCHD, so GNT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), GNT annualized -2.69% vs +11.45% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GNT or SCHD?
GNT has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GNT -88.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both GNT and SCHD?
GNT and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GNT and SCHD?
GNT and SCHD share 8 common holdings with a 8.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 180 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNT or SCHD?
GNT yields 7.95% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so GNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.