GNT vs VYM
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GNT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.18% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $163M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.95% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +25.43% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +48.24% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.07% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.33% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GNT vs VYM Performance
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust (GNT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GNT returned +48.24% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GNT is up 25.43% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, GNT compounded at +29.07% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +19.33% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs -2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for GNT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNT charges 1.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $118 vs $4 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNT currently yields 7.95% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GNT and VYM share 30 holdings out of 616 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNT or VYM?
GNT has an expense ratio of 1.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GNT or VYM?
Over the past year GNT returned +48.24% vs +26.05% for VYM, so GNT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GNT annualized -2.61% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GNT or VYM?
GNT has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GNT -88.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GNT and VYM?
GNT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GNT and VYM?
GNT and VYM share 30 common holdings with a 9.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 616 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNT or VYM?
GNT yields 7.95% while VYM yields 2.86%, so GNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.