GNT vs VTI
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GNT or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GNT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. GNT is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $176M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.40% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 281 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +21.27%Best | +13.35% |
| 1Y Return | +31.17%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.21%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.29%Best | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $24,156Best | $18,286 |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.1%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 27, 2011 to Oct 2, 2026 (15.7 years).
GNT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.7 years both funds cover.
GNT vs VTI Performance
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust (GNT) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GNT returned +31.17% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, GNT is up 21.27% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, GNT compounded at +31.21% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +19.29% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.23% annualized vs -2.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for GNT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNT charges 1.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $118 vs $3 annually, a gap of $115 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNT currently yields 7.40% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
46.2% of GNT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.7% of VTI's money is in holdings GNT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 122 days apart, GNT as of Mar 31, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
36 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in GNT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 281 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,116 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GNT (93.7% of the fund), and 10 for GNT that do not appear in VTI (9.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GNT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 4.15% | 0.89% | 3.26% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 4.71% | 0.14% | 4.57% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.68% | 0.52% | 2.16% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 2.96% | 0.21% | 2.75% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 2.95% | 0.12% | 2.83% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 2.38% | 0.07% | 2.31% |
| ADMArcher-daniels D | 2.22% | 0.05% | 2.17% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 1.83% | 0.03% | 1.80% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 1.68% | 0.02% | 1.66% |
| ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A | 1.53% | 0.04% | 1.49% |
46.2% of GNT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNT or VTI?
GNT has an expense ratio of 1.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $115 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GNT or VTI?
Over the past year GNT returned +31.17% vs +15.92% for VTI, so GNT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GNT annualized -2.80% vs +12.23% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GNT or VTI?
GNT has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GNT -88.1% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both GNT and VTI?
GNT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GNT and VTI?
46.2% of GNT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.7% of VTI's is in holdings GNT also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in GNT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNT or VTI?
GNT yields 7.40% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GNT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GNT led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. GNT is less concentrated, with 30.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.