GNT vs VTI
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GNT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GNT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $173M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.09% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.98% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +49.15% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.72% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.04% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
GNT vs VTI Performance
GAMCO Natural Resources Gold & Income Trust (GNT) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GNT returned +49.15% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GNT is up 26.98% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GNT compounded at +30.72% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +20.04% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GNT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for GNT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GNT charges 1.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $118 vs $3 annually, a gap of $115 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GNT currently yields 8.09% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GNT and VTI share 33 holdings out of 2842 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GNT or VTI?
GNT has an expense ratio of 1.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $115 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GNT or VTI?
Over the past year GNT returned +49.15% vs +21.39% for VTI, so GNT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GNT annualized -2.53% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GNT or VTI?
GNT has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GNT -88.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GNT and VTI?
GNT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GNT and VTI?
GNT and VTI share 33 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2842 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GNT or VTI?
GNT yields 8.09% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GNT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.