GQGU vs HUMM
GQG US Equity ETF vs 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, GQGU or HUMM?
GQGU and HUMM are close on what we can measure.
GQGU is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQGU | HUMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Tie | 0.49%Tie |
| AUM | $506M | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 72 | 66 |
| YTD Return | -2.98%Best | -10.49% |
| 1Y Return | -2.84% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 49.4%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | GQG Partners LLC | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2019 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
GQGU vs HUMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GQGU vs HUMM Performance
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC and 800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, GQGU is down 2.98% versus a loss of 10.49% for HUMM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQGU charges 0.49% per year while HUMM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $49 annually. On income, GQGU currently yields 1.00% against 0.00% for HUMM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 33 holdings in GQGU and 24 in HUMM, totalling 95.8% and 97.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 33 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 24 in HUMM, against full books of 72 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for HUMM that do not appear in our book for GQGU (62.0% of the fund), and 32 for GQGU that do not appear in HUMM (92.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GQGU and HUMM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQGU or HUMM?
GQGU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while HUMM charges 0.49%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQGU or HUMM?
GQGU yields 1.00% while HUMM yields 0.00%, so GQGU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HUMM better than GQGU?
GQGU is less concentrated, with 49.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.