GQGU vs VYM
GQG US Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GQGU or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQGU | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $678M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 44 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +6.52% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.83% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 9.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $10,540 | $12,454Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.0% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | GQG Partners LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.2 years).
GQGU vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GQGU vs VYM Performance
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQGU returned +4.83% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, GQGU is up 6.52% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GQGU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 9.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for GQGU and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQGU charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQGU currently yields 0.96% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
32.1% of GQGU's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 18.4% of VYM's money is in holdings GQGU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 56 days apart, GQGU as of Aug 25, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 603 in VYM, against full books of 44 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 555 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GQGU (79.0% of the fund), and 21 for GQGU that do not appear in VYM (61.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQGU | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.00% | 7.29% | 5.29% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 5.75% | 2.36% | 3.39% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.36% | 1.17% | 2.19% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 3.67% | 0.67% | 3.00% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 2.57% | 1.56% | 1.01% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 2.00% | 1.56% | 0.44% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 1.82% | 1.15% | 0.67% |
| STTState Street Corp. | 2.76% | 0.19% | 2.57% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 2.04% | 0.54% | 1.50% |
| ORCLOracle Corp. | 1.48% | 1.04% | 0.44% |
32.1% of GQGU is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQGU or VYM?
GQGU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQGU or VYM?
Over the past year GQGU returned +4.83% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GQGU annualized +4.48% vs +20.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQGU or VYM?
GQGU has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 9.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GQGU -8.4% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both GQGU and VYM?
GQGU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQGU and VYM?
32.1% of GQGU's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 18.4% of VYM's is in holdings GQGU also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQGU or VYM?
GQGU yields 0.96% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GQGU?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.